Volume 5, Issue 3, September 2020, Page: 55-60
The Research of Co-design Approaches Based on Designer Guidance in the Renovation of Old Community in Shanghai- Illustrated in the Case of Zhuyuan Community Center
Jin Zhu, Environmental Art Design Department of Fashion & Art Design College, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Zijun Zhang, Environmental Art Design Department of Fashion & Art Design College, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Tianjiao Hong, Environmental Art Design Department of Fashion & Art Design College, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Received: Oct. 16, 2020;       Accepted: Oct. 26, 2020;       Published: Oct. 30, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.larp.20200503.12      View  80      Downloads  24
Abstract
With the decrease in usable land in recent years, people have begun to pay more attention to the renovation of small and micro space in old community space and discussion on urban space have gradually shifted from spatial to social attributes and social meanings. The demonstration of public participation process has been exactly being of significance on urban updating and adaptive reusing of existing stocks. Simultaneously, it has caused rethink about conventional designer-leading projects and enlightened academics about bottom-up concept for renovation. Nevertheless, the existing approaches of public participation is still facing certain issues such as imperfect participation mechanism, unclear-defined authorities and responsibilities, halfway involvement and so on. Through analyzing the renovation progress of the public space of Zhuyuan community, this article is aimed to argue whether the public might continuously and authentically participate to the holistic processes from preliminary design to construction and final operation based on multi-collaborations. And modular design approaches are experimented in order to integrate the variable resources, optimize the spatial functions and provide the ease of construction and assembly. Eventually, the public participation principles and strategies based on the guidance of designers are posed, which might provide a reference for the follow-up researches.
Keywords
Public Space, Participatory Design, Community Renovation, Modular Furniture
To cite this article
Jin Zhu, Zijun Zhang, Tianjiao Hong, The Research of Co-design Approaches Based on Designer Guidance in the Renovation of Old Community in Shanghai- Illustrated in the Case of Zhuyuan Community Center, Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020, pp. 55-60. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20200503.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Trischler, Jakob; Pervan, Simon J.; Kelly, Stephen J.; Scott, Don R. (2018). "The Value of Codesign". Journal of Service Research. 21: 75–100. doi: 10.1177/1094670517714060.
[2]
Pieters, Maarten; Jansen, Stefanie (2017). The 7 Principles of Complete Co-creation. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers. p. 15. ISBN 978-90-6369-473-9.
[3]
Li zhi (2013). Tianzifang: a bottom-up sustainable old city renewal model. China: Fujian Architecture. 86-88+82. ISBN 1000-114x.
[4]
Yang Siqin (2016). Coin Street: The best example of community building to promote urban renewal. http://www.participation.cn/xinwenzixun/guojidongtai/19797.html.
[5]
Andrew Bibby (2009). Coin Street - case study.http://www.andrewbibby.com/socialenterprise/coin-street.html.
[6]
Kaley Overstreet (2016). Alejandro Aravena's Downloadable Housing Plans and the Real Meaning of "Open-Source Urbanism". https://www.archdaily.com/788524.
[7]
Jenna McKnight (2016). Alejandro Aravena makes housing designs available to the public for free.https://www.dezeen.com/2016/04/06/alejandro-aravena-elemental-social-housing-designs-architecture-open-source-pritzker.
[8]
kounkuey: 2017.https://www.kounkuey.org/about.
[9]
Xu Leiqing (2018) Planning Practice of Tangqiao Community from the Perspective of Social Governance. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4NDA3NzgzOA==&mid=2681730557&idx=1&sn=2bfaa830cc152e44853759e41acc7e9a&chksmect.
[10]
2018. The reply of the State Council on the Overall Urban Planning of Shanghai, Town Planning Newsletter.
[11]
Xu Zhongzheng (2000). Review and prospect of Community construction in Shanghai, Shanghai University Press.
[12]
Xu Minghong (2013). Study on the effectiveness of urban residents’ community participation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
[13]
Wangle Puqin (2015). Research on public participation and community satisfaction–Taking the comprehensive survey of shanghai community as an example, Tongji University Community Research, Shanghai Community Research and Planning
[14]
Hong Tianjiao (2019). Research on public space constructing strategies of shanghai old community based on public participation, Donghua University.
[15]
Shen yao, Yang yan, Mu Xia yong, Xu Meng yi (2018). Theoretical analysis of participatory design in the context of community design and research on sustainable operation mode, Architecture Journal.
[16]
Shen Aobo, Liu Jiayan, Shen Yichen (2018). Experience and characteristics of the old Japanese communities–the case study of two communities in Tokyo, Shanghai City Planning.
[17]
Putnam, R (1993). Making democracy work: civil tradition in modern Italy, Princeton university press.
[18]
Cao Zheng (2019). Study on community renewal strategy based on the concept of sharing, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture.
[19]
Dong Liqin (2019). Discuss the reuse of idle space in old community, Building Environment Science and Engineering.
Browse journals by subject