Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2019, Page: 28-35
Optimal Thickness of the Heat Insulation Layer for the External Walls
Alexander Gorshkov, Department of Intellectual Systems and Information Security, Institute of Information Technologies and Automation, Saint-Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Received: Jan. 16, 2019;       Accepted: Mar. 12, 2019;       Published: Oct. 23, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.larp.20190402.12      View  23      Downloads  4
Abstract
The paper presents the methodology for calculating the heat energy losses via external walls of apartment building before and after additional heat insulation of the facades using mineral wool insulation. Normally, a higher level of thermal insulation of external enclosing structures is provided by a greater thickness of the thermal insulation layer. Additional insulation thickness requires additional investment. The higher the level of thermal insulation of external walling, the less heat is lost through the walls. Therefore, energy saving measures should be considered not only from a technical point of view, but also from an economic point of view. Based on the known parameters of the duration of heating period, investments for additional insulation of the facades in the considered apartment building and values of the operating costs for heating before and after the facades insulation, an estimation of the predicted payback period was evaluated for various thickness of the additional thermal insulation layer (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mm). For the considered object an optimal thickness of the additional heat insulation layer is calculated. For that optimal thickness, payback period, calculated with account for heating energy tariffs growth rates and discounted future cash flows, takes its minimal value.
Keywords
Apartment Building, External Wall, Insulation, Thermal Energy, Transmission Losses, Energy Saving Investments, Payback Period, Energy Efficiency
To cite this article
Alexander Gorshkov, Optimal Thickness of the Heat Insulation Layer for the External Walls, Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2019, pp. 28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20190402.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Benati S. An optimization model for stochastic project networks with cash flows. Computational Management Science 3. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 271–284.
[2]
Elmaghraby S. E. On the fallacy of averages in project risk management. European Journal of Operational Research. 2005. No. 165. Pp. 307–313.
[3]
Elmaghraby S. E., Herroelen W. S. The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990. No. 49. Pp. 35–49.
[4]
Elmaghraby S. E., J. Kamburowski On project representation and activity floats. Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering. 1990. No. 15. Pp. 626–637.
[5]
Herroelen W. S., Dommelen P. V., Demeulemeester E. L. Project network models with discounted cash flows – A guided tour through recent developments. European Journal of Operational Research. 1997. No. 100. Pp. 97–121.
[6]
Herroelen W. S., Leus R. Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research. 2005. No. 165. Pp. 289–306.
[7]
Özdamar L., Dündar H. A flexible heuristic for a multi-mode capital constrained project scheduling problem with probabilistic cash inflows. Computers and Operations Research. 1997. No.24. Pp.1187–1200.
[8]
Rockafellar R. T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk. 2000. No.2. Pp. 21–41.
[9]
Stephan K., Menassa C. Modeling the Effect of Building Stakeholder Interactions on Value Perception of Sustainable Retrofits. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 68–78.
[10]
Bond S., Mitchell P. Alpha and persistence in real estate fund performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance. 2010. No. 41. Pp. 53–79.
[11]
Kaplan S., Schoar A. Private equity performance: Returns, persistence, and capital flows. Journal of Finance. 2005. No. 60. Pp. 1791–1823.
[12]
De Santoli, L., Fraticelli, F., Fornari, F., Calice, C. Energy performance assessment and a retrofit strategies in public school buildings in Rome. Energy and Buildings. 2014. No. 68. Pp. 196–202.
[13]
Corrado, V., Murano, G., Paduos, S., Riva, G. On the Refurbishment of the Public Building Stock Toward the Nearly Zero-energy Target: Two Italian case studies. Energy Procedia. 2016. No. 101. Pp. 105–112.
[14]
Gorshkov A. S., Vatin N. I., Rymkevich P. P., Kydrevich O. O. Payback period of investments in energy saving. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 65–75.
[15]
Gorshkov A. S. Model of Evaluating the Projected Payback Period in Energy Preservation. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015. No. 12. Pp. 136–146.
Browse journals by subject